My name is Manuel Herranz, founder of HUM – Human Unity Movement.
Our first proposal has been to call for an open and transparent Congress of experts to deal with the establishment of human unity because if we unite in an inclusive decision-making system we will avoid and prevent mutual harm and only look for the common good.
However, that Congress has not taken place because we need to face reality with accuracy as follows:
The cause of humans´ discord is the weapons, objects meant to kill, necessarily organized in armed units, states, command chains enforcing every individual´s action. Something not only hateful but contradictory because a person cannot accept, even if she wanted to, to be deprived of her own will or freedom.
However, human concord and cooperation are the consequence of disarmament, which can be only universal -something possible only in our time.
For disarming we need to unite all arms under a single command, because they are only because/against each other (its cause is itself), and united they are unnecessary, redundant.
Therefore, I am assuming command on all arms and require acknowledgment of it from each arm, conditional to the acknowledgment of all arms.
A single command ends with all threats and harms since even that command cannot cause them, since it would be as to harming itself.
From it follows the use of common sense, this is human equality, disarmament, and the (best) use of all resources for common good, so that private property becomes redundant too.
(Indeed, without armed force there cannot be private property; the arm necessary cause of private property which cannot exist without violence. But even more, the arm is the sufficient cause of private property because the arm is to kill and harm and therefore it cannot be shared and all the things are all necessarily private as this is the way they serve a particular army or state only)
Freedom is the aim and the way; a voluntary act, independent from the state/army enforcement, of sending this message (also copied to the UN), inviting all persons to unite for all to enjoy full freedom in the community.
Some intelligent people of the past saw and understood that Peace and Love are the same as Human Unity or inclusive decision making because logically and obviously in this way (mutual) harm is excluded and, best, it brings about the use of common sense, this is, to treat others as we would like to be treated. But the vision of those people was only a dream, a hope in an unknown and incommunicado world.
And those people’s works could hardly have continuity because, in the past, beyond being human unity an inviable proposal in an unknown world, common sense weakens the state, something clearly exposed by Socrates’ case, and so is it that we hardly have references of this so simple, logical and evident way to put an end to human misery.
However, today with the current global interconnection allowing us to act simultaneously, universal peace and love are already possible, and promoting human unity or common good is no longer prejudicial to the state since it affects all states in the same manner.